Don Cherry

簡介: 一生致力於黑人音樂文化探索與重建的爵士名家 Don Cherry,首先令人聯(lián)想到的便是他那支只手即可握滿的 “Pocket Trumpet”,1957年加入自由爵士樂先驅(qū) Ornette Coleman 的樂團,是他第一次受人注意的時期,1959年與Coleman一同前往紐約加入 更多>

一生致力於黑人音樂文化探索與重建的爵士名家 Don Cherry,首先令人聯(lián)想到的便是他那支只手即可握滿的 “Pocket Trumpet”,1957年加入自由爵士樂先驅(qū) Ornette Coleman 的樂團,是他第一次受人注意的時期,1959年與Coleman一同前往紐約加入專輯“Something Else”、“Change Of The Centry”以及“Free Jazz”的錄制工作,成為另一個興風作浪變革爵士樂的先驅(qū)動份子之一。60年代初期,離開 Ornette Coleman 的 Don Cherry 先后與 Steve Lacy、Sonny Rollins、Archie Shepp、Albert Ayler 等人合作。1964年到1966年與 Gato Barbieri 組成樂團并留下了經(jīng)典的專輯“Complete Communion”以及“Symphony Gor Improvisers”。70年代之后,Cherry將部份時間投注在音樂教育上,并在Dartmouth College任職,在往后的幾年,Cherry不斷地加入新素材在他的創(chuàng)作之中,尤其對於所謂“第三世界”音樂更顯熱衷。
by Chris Kelsey
The second track from Tomorrow Is the Question — Ornette Colemans 1959 wake-up call to the fusty hard bop movement — is a medium tempo blues, Tears Inside. After the statement of the tunes two-beat, countrified-bebop theme, trumpeter Don Cherry plays a solo that — for all its frail beauty and general adherence to modern jazzs harmonic conventions — sounds as if it might have been played by Miles Davis or Chet Baker. Coleman and Cherry were vanguardists, to be sure, and they were received as such by critics, musicians, and audiences alike. Even so, today, in listening to these early free jazz sides, one wonders what all the fuss was about, for its clear that both musicians — especially Cherry — played in a style derived from the mainstream of jazzs development.
Naturally, the passing of four decades provides us a perspective denied listeners at the time; changes that seem slight to us today were magnified then. Coleman and Cherrys elastic relationship to pitch and swing-time were certainly a liberation from the tyranny of equal temperament and literal pulse. Despite the musics revolutionary characteristics, however, no one would now deny that the work of these men is an extension or interpretation of the jazz tradition. This is particularly obvious in Cherrys case; abstracted from his contexts, Don Cherrys style was in a real sense grounded in bebop. He wasnt an especially strong bebop player by classic standards — his range and facility were somewhat limited, for one thing — but externally, his style bore the marks of modern jazz in terms of melody, harmony, rhythm, and phrasing.
Evaluating Cherry in classic terms is a mistake, for like Miles Davis — and Coleman, for that matter — concepts of Western musical objectivity were nearly irrelevant to his work. Cherry was not gifted with extraordinary chops, but those are classicist concerns, and his was a wholly romantic art. Cherrys greatest strength was less easily quantified, less tangible: an ability to convey emotional depth via a subtle manipulation of musical elements. An improvised Don Cherry line might bear all the typical contours of bebop, but Cherry micro-managed every aspect of his playing, rhythmically, harmonically, melodically, timbrally, and dynamically. Like Coleman, Cherrys sound came as close to the expressive qualities of the human voice as was instrumentally possible. And his playing was utterly spontaneous; Cherry was among the most unpredictable of improvisers. His frequent stutters in mid-solo may have stemmed from a limited vocabulary of canned phrases, but his resultant recoveries were the stuff of which great jazz is made.
Cherry first attained prominence with Coleman, with whom he began playing around 1957. At that time Cherrys instrument of choice was a pocket trumpet (or cornet) — a miniature version of the full-sized model. The smaller instrument — in Cherrys hands, at least — got a smaller, slightly more nasal sound than is typical of the larger horn. Though he would play a regular cornet off and on throughout his career, Cherry remained most closely identified with the pocket instrument. Cherry stayed with Coleman through the early 60s, playing on the first seven (and most influential) of the saxophonists albums. In 1960, he recorded The Avant-Garde with John Coltrane. After leaving Colemans band, Cherry played with Steve Lacy, Sonny Rollins, Archie Shepp, and Albert Ayler. In 1963-4, Cherry co-led the New York Contemporary Five with Shepp and John Tchicai. With Gato Barbieri, Cherry led a band in Europe from 1964-6, recording two of his most highly regarded albums, Complete Communion and Symphony for Improvisers. Cherry taught at Dartmouth College in 1970, and recorded with the Jazz Composers Orchestra in 1973. He lived in Sweden for four years; he used the country as a base for his travels around Europe and the Middle East. Cherry became increasingly interested in other, mostly non-Western styles of music. In the late 70s and early 80s, he performed and recorded with Codona, a cooperative group with percussionist Nana Vasconcelos and multi-instrumentalist Collin Walcott. Codonas music was a pastiche of African, Asian, and other indigenous musics. Concurrently, Cherry joined with ex-Coleman associates Charlie Haden, Ed Blackwell, and Dewey Redman to form Old and New Dreams, a band dedicated to playing the compositions of their former employer. After the dissolution of Codona, Cherry formed Nu with Vasconcelos and saxophonist Carlos Ward. In 1988, he made Art Deco, a more traditional album of acoustic jazz, with Haden, Billy Higgins, and saxophonist James Clay. Until his death in 1995, Cherry would continue to combine disparate musical genres; his interest in world music never abated. Cherry learned to play and compose for wood flutes, tambura, gamelan, and various other non-Western instruments. Elements of these musics inevitably found their way into his later compositions and performances, as on 1990s Multi Kulti, a characteristic celebration of musical diversity. As a live performer, Cherry was notoriously uneven. It was not unheard of for him to arrive very late for gigs, and his technique — never great to begin with — showed on occasion a considerable, perhaps inexcusable decline. In his last years, especially, Cherry seemed less self-possessed as a musician. Yet, his musical legacy is one of such influence that his personal failings fade in relative significance.